Shotcraft
Video generation

Veo 3.1 Fast

Lower-latency, lower-cost variant of Veo 3.1 with the same feature surface: native audio, 4K support, up to three reference images, first/last frame and video extension.

A video generation model by Google · read 2026-08-14 · sourcing high

Up to
8 seconds
Resolution
4K
Aspect ratios
16:9, 9:16
Weights
Not released
API
Yes
Commercial use
Not established

Model ID veo-3.1-fast-generate-preview.

Commercial use — Not established

The research notes for this model record other terms but do not state a commercial-use position, and no licence page was retrieved, so it is not established here. Check the vendor's own terms.

  • Output is watermarked. SynthID watermarking; 2-day server-side retention; Preview status

The conditions above were extracted from the licence notes recorded during research, and each one shows the sentence it came from so you can check the reading. Read the licence before you rely on any of this. Nothing on this page is legal advice, and this site does not tell you a model is cleared for commercial use.

Specification

Vendor figures, read 2026-08-14Read from Google's own documentation on 2026-08-14. Vendors change these between model versions without announcing it, so check theirs before you commit a shot to a number. Sourcing for this entry is strong: the figures came from pages we retrieved and read. Check the vendor's current documentation

What it takes in
text, image, video
What it makes
video, audio
Maximum duration
8 seconds
Maximum resolution
4K
Aspect ratios
16:9, 9:16
Controls
image-to-video, keyframes, reference-character-consistency, extend
Weights
Not released
API
Yes
Pricing
Gemini API priced per second of output: $0.10/sec at 720p, $0.12/sec at 1080p, $0.30/sec at 4K
Released or updated
2025-10

Strengths

  • Roughly a quarter the per-second cost of standard Veo 3.1 at 720p
  • Retains 4K, reference images and extension
  • Native audio included

Weaknesses

  • Lower fidelity than standard Veo 3.1
  • Same 8-second cap and 16:9 / 9:16 only
  • Preview status

Best for

Where the sources disagree

Recorded rather than resolved. Picking the tidier number would hide the fact that the vendor's own pages do not agree.

What to understand before using it

Explainers naming the mechanisms this model's own documentation mentions.

MCP servers that front Google

Servers in the media MCP directory whose own description or homepage names this vendor. Absence of a server here is not evidence that none exists: most publish no tool list at all.

See it from the vendor

Shotcraft hosts no sample output. Judging a model means watching its own showreel with your own eyes, and a clip re-hosted here would be a clip we chose.

Nearby in the directory

Sources

Read on 2026-08-14. A source that has changed since then will not be reflected here until the next pass.